To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Abilities
Just after pre-handling got taken place, the interest path analysis is actually looked to own outliers (study affairs bigger than step 1.5 times the interquartile assortment getting a given varying), from the exploring boxplots. The brand new outlying analysis activities (n = 19) was in fact omitted for individual studies circumstances within the eyes-tracking methods , consisting of 4.22% of the complete data.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig 2) (ignoring county stress) and you can r (15) = -.499, p = .041 (controlling to have state stress).
There can be no significant relationship between LSAS results and you will earliest obsession years with the muscles, roentgen (23) = -.141, p = .521 which had been also the situation when controlling to have county stress using a limited relationship r (20) = -.133, p =. 556
Cures
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations and additionally revealed that when controlling to own state stress, there is zero extreme relationship within LSAS scores and dwell time for you to your head r (25) = -.063, p = .756, you r (27) = -.090, p = .643, and also the records roentgen (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for https://datingranking.net/sugar-daddy/ state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
Hyperscanning
A robust inverse matchmaking is receive ranging from scanpath size and you will LSAS get, r (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever overlooking condition stress, and you can remained when county stress are regulated to own r (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig step three).
A robust negative relationships is actually discovered anywhere between overall saccade matter and LSAS get, r (29) = -.511, p = .005 when disregarding condition anxiety, which remained high an once state anxiety is controlled for r (26) = -.516, p = .005. Zero relationship is discover between imply saccade amplitude and you can LSAS get yet not, r (29) = -.176, p = .362 regardless if state anxiety was controlled getting roentgen (26) = -.160, p = .417